How can place attachment improve scientific literacy?
Citizen science — voluntary participation by members of the public in authentic scientific projects and programmes, often in an informal, hands-on way
Civic scientific literacy — an individual’s ability to understand and use science to advance the common good and engage in public scientific discussion and decision-making
Meaning-making — the process where people interpret relationships, situations and self-image in light of their own knowledge and experience
Place attachment — a meaningful bond between a person and a specific place that may involve emotions, knowledge and beliefs, and behaviours
Sense of place — the particular characteristics of a place that make it what it is
Critical thinking — careful thinking that involves analysis of available information and arguments to form a sound judgement
“In COASST, we have seen time and time again the deep care that programme participants maintain for the places they study,” says Julia. “At the same time, participants gain knowledge about science, scientific processes and the natural components they study. We wondered whether there was a link between connections to place and the learning that occurs there.”
Why is citizen science important?
While formal science education – the science we study in school or college – provides important scientific skills and knowledge, a lot of learning occurs outside of formal settings. Citizen science allows people to choose what project appeals to them, and engage in ways suited to them.
“Research in social psychology suggests that individual identity and life experience can influence whether or not science is perceived as relevant and influences the degree to which science is used in decision-making processes,” explains Ben. This means we learn and understand science best through a highly personalised lens – the sum of our lived experiences. “Historically, formal education has focused on science content in a universal, remote and de-contextualised form. On its own, this has failed to foster the kind of civic scientific literacy necessary in the 21st century,” says Ben.
Hands-on, out-of-doors, environmental citizen science, where participants have the chance to visit their data collection site repeatedly, can offer unique opportunities for learning and personal connection. “These projects allow for extended participation where people can refine their skills, integrate their observations across time, and develop a deeper understanding of the phenomena or place,” explains Julia.
How are Ben and Julia working on this?
COASST is a 23-year-old citizen science project, recruiting coastal residents in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska to participate in marine ecology and conservation research on the beach. To assess patterns of seabird mortality due to natural and human-induced events across both time and space, COASST participants collect data in three different areas: beached birds, marine debris and evidence of human use of the beach environment. “For this project, we focused specifically on the COASST beached bird module,” says Julia. “Most participants come to the programme with little-to-no bird identification experience and live within 20 km of their data collection beach.”
Ben and Julia used two social science research methods to gather data. Firstly, they surveyed nearly 300 participants about place attachment and programme participation. Secondly, they interviewed 30 participants about critical scientific thinking and programme engagement.
What do the results show?
After analysing the research, Ben and Julia found that there are a certain set of place attachment catalysts that appear across diverse sample types within the COASST programme. These catalysts help explain why individuals feel attached to the places they monitor in the programme. “The six catalysts are self-identity, science affinity, natural/ environmental bonding, science community bonding, family and friend bonding, and social rootedness,” says Ben.
For example, the self-identity category means that, for some individuals, the attachment they feel to their COASST beach relates to their sense that that place makes up part of who they are – their perception of self. Natural/environmental bonding means individuals feel connected due to the nature or environment in that place (such as the plants and animals found there), and social-rootedness means individuals feel attached because the place is part of their history or ancestry.
“This helps us understand how the power and significance of a place might be leveraged in a more personalised and targeted way through place-based citizen science programmes,” explains Ben. “The results show us how citizen science might help people harness the connection they have to a place and use that for positive action,” says Ben.
How has participating in citizen science affected people?
Ben and Julia found that COASST participants improve their identification accuracy over time – a result of repeated and consistent identification practice and engagement with COASST staff who train and provide opportunities to learn. “Participants experience deep learning about a specific place through repeated interactions, observations of the place, and processing of hands-on information with feedback from project staff,” says Ben. “We believe that the knowledge participants gain about scientific processes or the ecology of that place is not limited to that one context. Instead, we suggest that such understanding goes beyond that one place. Accordingly, we hypothesise that the deep relationships and interactions between participants and specific places observed through the COASST programme have broader impacts on the ability of those participants to think critically and with a scientific lens.”
Ben and Julia’s results also show that engaging in the COASST programme influences participants’ sense of environmental responsibility and can increase their desire to engage in science-based processes to understand and monitor places of importance. “This can also lead to specific behavioural outcomes (like engaging in more citizen science) and means there seems to be a relationship between place attachment, science affinity, and a sense of stewardship and care,” explains Ben.
How can citizen science programmes be the best they can be?
Instead of just being the backdrop from which data are collected, strengthening or capitalising on the relationships between people and the places where they might engage in citizen science can play a central role in increasing interest in public research participation.
How exactly can programmes do this? “Firstly, research programmes can develop opportunities for local residents to collect repeated, frequent observations of a place or environmental phenomena,” says Ben. “Secondly, they should include tasks that require participants to ask questions and make sense of the data collected from a place, instead of just collecting data and submitting it. This might include making connections between the information collected and the lives and livelihoods of those that use the places under study. Thirdly, programmes should have a structure that supports peer interaction and engagement, so that participants share their knowledge of place with others and can compare and contrast experiences to make broader inferences.”
Reference
https://doi.org/10.33424/FUTURUM349
Ben records information about a common yellowthroat as a part of a long-term avian conservation monitoring project. © Sam Lowry
Associate Director, Faculty Development Center, Furman University, USA
Fields of research: STEM Education, Conservation, Environmental Geography
Funder: US National Science Foundation (NSF)
PROFESSOR JULIA PARRISH
Associate Dean, College of the Environment, University of Washington, USA
Fields of research: Marine Ecology, Conservation, Citizen Science
Funders: US National Science Foundation (NSF), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA)51
Joint research project: Critical Thinking and People-Place Relationships in Citizen Science
This material is based upon work supported by the US NSF Advancing Informal Science Learning (AISL) program under Grant Nos. 1322820 and 2031884.
Environmental geographers study the relationships between organisms and the environment. Ben explains more.
“Given the growing separation between people and nature in our modern world, there is great need for geographers to find ways to reconnect people with the environment and educate them about how their actions impact our ecological home.
“My research is rewarding because I get to ask questions about ecosystems, the creatures in them and the people and cultures that rely on and interact with them. I am able to learn about things that are fascinating to me and also find ways to better care for the things and places that I study.
“The opportunities are so diverse that it’s hard to think of a pressing challenge that isn’t open to geographical examination! For example, geographers look at how our coastlines will respond to sea-level rise, how political borders influence the products we buy in the grocery store, and how conservationists can manage conflict.”
• Ben recommends studying an undergraduate degree in Earth and environmental science, biology, chemistry or mathematics. “However, environmental geography is a very interdisciplinary field, and those who want to work within it need training in social science as well – including psychology, sociology, political science and communications,” says Ben.
• If you are more interested in social science, consider studying this as an undergraduate degree and environmental geography as a postgraduate degree.
• The American Association for Geographers has an interactive map on college geography courses in the Americas.
Environmental Science provides information on careers in environmental science, sustainability and geography. It also explains what being a geographer is like and has a list of various college programmes that will help you become a geographer.
• Because environmental geography is such a diverse area of study, the pay can vary widely. According to Glassdoor, the average salary of an environmental geographer in the US is $61,164 per year. See the full range of salaries here.
“I spent much of my time outdoors as a child. I loved observing and learning about the animals and natural systems around me and was especially interested in birds. I became fascinated with farming and growing food. I also became interested in travel as a way to see new places and ecosystems, and developed a love of writing and forms of creative expression.
“I used to watch TV shows about nature and animals and read books about conservation, veterinary medicine and science fiction. Several passionate math and science teachers encouraged me to learn more about the world through observation, experimentation and curiosity.
“My career pathway has been anything but direct. My undergraduate degree focused on communications and marketing, and I thought I would be an environmental journalist. I spent years volunteering with environmental and educational non-profit organisations and realised that being able to understand environmental policies and systems of governance was critical for protecting natural resources. I completed a master’s degree in public administration and environmental policy and pursued my doctorate in environmental geography. I’m glad to have this interdisciplinary pathway into STEM. My diverse education allows me to look at the scientific challenges we face today from different perspectives.
“Some of my most impactful experiences emerged from the volunteering I did as an educational guide at my local zoo, an assistant in a bird banding field station in college, and as an environmental education intern. Each of those experiences opened doors for me and shaped my next steps.
“The work I’ve done to inspire care for birds is perhaps my proudest work so far. Whether it’s through the courses I teach, the research I conduct or the writing I do to highlight the significance of our feathered friends, it gives me great meaning to be able to engage in this work.
1. Try a lot of experiences and learn about as many different things as possible – this will help you identify what you are most passionate about. Doing something you love will lead you to your greatest success.
2. Spend time observing the natural world around you and recording your observations.
3. Foster skills at communicating and interacting with people, especially in negotiating multiple interests at once.
4. Always take advantage of opportunities to learn new things.
5. Start small and be persistent – small actions eventually add up to big results.
Marine ecology is the study of how organisms in salt water habitats, from the deep sea to the open ocean to coastal beaches, survive and thrive in their environment. Marine conservation acknowledges the negative influence humans have on ocean systems and seeks to work cooperatively with non-science organisations to find lasting solutions.
“How will marine species deal with warmer or more acidic water?” asks Julia. “Will coastal development and the associated disturbance and pollution force some species to abandon nesting, feeding habitats, or migratory routes? What can we do about this? The chance to be a part of the solution, instead of just part of the problem, is the most rewarding thing.”
Being a marine ecologist might allow you to work in some fantastic places. “I’ve been tremendously privileged over my career to work on remote seabird colonies and on research vessels in some wild, beautiful places that most people will never see,” says Julia.
• The MarineBio Conservation Society is a great resource for learning more about ocean life and marine science. It also has a page specifically on marine ecology.
• Some universities offer degrees in marine ecology, but studying a degree in ecology, marine biology, environmental science, geology, chemistry or oceanography is also an option.
• Julia advises, “It’s important to be able to translate phenomena into numbers to enable analysis, so take statistics and data science courses.”
• Julia also encourages students to learn about science history and ethics. “We’re taught that science is a truth, but that’s as subjective as any other statement. What is studied, how it’s studied and how we understand the world is as much about who is in charge as anything else. It’s critical to go into science with open eyes to that bias if we hope to create an equitable and truly creative space.”
“I had a chance to spend an undergraduate semester at the Duke Marine Lab. It was slightly scary as it meant leaving my university and friends and going somewhere new, but it was a great experience. It opened up graduate school as an opportunity for me, and I never looked back.
“I’m proudest of COASST. It’s an internationally acclaimed citizen science programme producing great science that is published in scientific literature and highly cited by other marine scientists and conservationists, simultaneously digging deep into why people join, what makes them stay, and how they understand themselves to be a part of the science team.”
1. Get out there. Observe. Get wet and muddy. Pick up slimy things. Ask questions!
2. Don’t try to leap directly into saving the world. Take the time to understand the world and how it works. Otherwise, you may end up saving the wrong parts or missing what’s important.
3. Everyone will have unique choices and opportunities. Don’t be afraid to take advantage of them and go outside of your comfort zone.
Write it in the comments box below and Ben or Julia will get back to you. (Remember, researchers are very busy people, so you may have to wait a few days.)